Basic
Option 1 - Screening
Rapid screening of fourteen location-specific climate hazards aligned with EU Taxonomy (EU/2021/2139).
Direct likelihood projections for each hazard, designed for quick grasp.
Independent expert review at a clear, fixed fee.
Compact documentation ready to slot into building surveys and due diligence packs.
Three-day turnaround.
Intermediate
Option 2 - Resilience Review
Material climate-related risks identified for the specific building, taking known vulnerabilities and sector context into account.
Risk levels derived from both hazard likelihood and consequence severity for a grounded, defensible rating.
Targeted adaptation recommendations offered to guide practical next steps.
Independent expert assessment at a fixed fee, delivered within five working days.
Advanced
Option 3 - Detailed Assessment
On-site visit to fully understand your property and its unique challenges.
Expert identification of site-specific risks and vulnerabilities.
Practical, tailored recommendations.
Guidance on operational procedures to improve climate resiliency.
Clear, easy-to-use reporting to support compliance and strategic decision-making.
Option 2: This assessment provides risk ratings considering the likelihood of the climate hazards and the severity of the consequences. Generic recommendations will be made where relevant. The report will be provided within ten working days (with a red flag note of key risks on Day 5)
Any amendments, expansions, interpretations and recommendations will be charged accordingly. This includes (but is not limited to): decarbonisation pathway, EU Taxonomy alignment, Fund ESG Strategy screening. We also do not provide alternative RCP pathways or outcome years under this service.
Our climate risk reports are not a guarantee of any specific outcome or future performance; nor are they statements of fact or predictions of the future. Climate risk ratings have a particular element of uncertainty (i.e., even under a low risk rating, an extreme event may occur that is not projected by the modelling results), and Kintera cannot be held accountable for any losses or liability that may result from following our advice. Neither the report nor any other statements or representations by Kintera Limited should be construed by the named Client or any third party as legal and/or financial advice. Further, Kintera Limited cannot be held responsible for reliance on the contents of this report by any third parties other than the named Client
Climate models use coordinated ‘SSP-RCP’ scenarios that are developed for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Assessment Reports. In the report, and aligned with BBP recommendations, Kintera will adopt the most conservative view, SSP5-RCP8.5. While this is the most extreme scenario modelled, users should examine it critically, given the uncertainties inherent in climate modelling.
